Tag: Anti

  • This Poster Is A Perfect Example Of Anti-Breastfeeding

    This poster is a perfect example of anti-breastfeeding “information”. This notion that you can’t eat certain foods when breastfeeding is not based in science. Let’s look at some of the information.

    First of all let’s look at foods that “okay” for breastfeeding mothers. Nothing really wrong with what they say except that you don’t have to take in calcium to make milk with calcium. But the real problem is that this is a diet for people who are relatively affluent. Many mothers could not afford to eat such a diet and thus be frightened into formula feeding, which, I should emphasize is actually more expensive that the foods mentioned here. This is a stratagem used by formula companies. A prime example a few years ago was a campaign by one formula company in Brazil, supported by the Brazilian pediatric society, saying that your breastfed baby eats what you eat. Posters were widely distributed showing a baby suckling at a breast that looks like a doughnut, or looks like a hamburger.

    What about the panels of foods “to avoid”.

    1. Sugary foods. The poster says in this section to avoid fatty foods and salty foods as well as sugary foods. We all should try to keep our sugar, salt and fat intake at a reasonable level. But to imply that if you eat a lot of sugar your baby has an increased risk of obesity is just plain wrong. Breastmilk, in fact, does not change much in response to what you eat. It changes from morning to evening, from day to day, from month 1 to month 6, and later, but not because of what you eat. But if you eat a lot of sugar, your milk will have the same amount of sugar as if you ate no sugar at all.

    2. “You might find that just a dash of pepper is enough to make your baby irritated and fussy for hours”. This is pure fantasy. There is no evidence for this being true. And it is unlikely that anything in pepper or other spices would get into the milk in quantities that would bother the baby.

    3. Citrus fruits? “Certain compounds” are supposed to the irritating to the baby´s gut. Oh, please! If these “certain compounds got into the milk would they not be irritating to the breast or nipple?

    4. Caffeine? Babies do not excrete caffeine as rapidly as adults true, but so little gets into the milk that a cup or two of coffee will not bother the baby. Caffeine is given to premature babies as a treatment and nobody worries about how they might excrete caffeine. It’s not right to deprive breastfeeding mothers from drinking coffee and tea in reasonable amounts. This poster eliminates much of what mothers like to eat.

    5. Processed foods? Not a great choice for anyone, this is not specific to breastfeeding mothers. But just as above, the preservatives will not get into the milk in any significant quantities.

    6. Garlic? Are they insane? Garlic does not bother babies. This is prejudice against people who eat garlic. Most of the world loves garlic and eat it when the baby breastfeeds without harm to anyone.

    7. No peppermint, fennel, parsley, or chamomile? There is no evidence for this to show that the way people typically eat these can reach therapeutic levels.

    8. Alcohol, no level of alcohol in the milk is safe for the breastfed baby? Except that almost no alcohol gets into the milk. See this article http://ibconline.ca/maternal-medications/. Alcohol is discussed near the end of the article, but it’s worth reading the whole thing.

    This poster is an appalling attempt to frighten women out of breastfeeding and enjoying what they like to eat. These restrictions on what breastfeeding mothers can eat have been debunked decades ago. Let’s encourage good nutrition for everyone, and let’s stop haranguing breastfeeding mothers into stopping breastfeeding by worrying them about their diets.

    You can find a more about how to prevent problems with breastfeeding, including preventing fussiness, “colic”, “reflux” “allergy to something in the mother’s milk” and much more in my ebook called Breastfeeding: Empowering Parents: www.ibconline.ca/ebook

     

  • Anti Bullying Isn’t Something That Should be Discussed

    So I was listening to the radio the other week and it was talking about anti bullying week/day.

    Anti bullying is something that should not be discussed just on a certain week or day but something that should be regularly talked about openly and honestly.

    No one has the right to bully anyone, whether that be in the work place, at home, on the streets, at a school or through social media.

    No one has the right to make someone else feel worthless, fear for their safety or fear that their belongings may be taken from them, no one should be forced to hand over their belongings or monies through threats, violence or fear tactics.

    Remember that 1 nasty thing that you say or do to someone could be the final straw and the thing that leads them to seep into deep depression, contemplate harming themselves or to even take their own lives, and destroy their families lives along with theirs.

    For the bully,

    Do you really want to be responsible for someone else’s death?

    For the bullied,

    There is always someone to talk to, speak up and ask for help, once you do your life will drastically change.

    Don’t let the bullies win, a bully wins when the victim stays silent, a bully loses when they speak out.!

    So I urge you to speak out and not just on anti bully week or day!

    To share your own story, trying to raise awareness of any topic or would like us to do so on your behalf, want to find out our advertising prices for our Facebook page and or our website or would like your new or established blog featured on our site? If so please send us an email to mumsadviceltd@outlook.com

  • If Your Thinking Of Not Vaccinating Your Child Read This

    Jennifer Hibben-White took to Facebook regarding vaccinations she said:

    This is my son Griffin, and he may have measles.

    On February 9th, I received a phone call from York Region Public Health, informing me that Griffin, alongside my mother and I, was potentially exposed to the measles virus while attending a newborn weigh-in appointment at my doctor’s office in Markham on January 27th.

    Griffin was 15 days old at the time.

    I was informed that someone who later developed measles sat in the doctor’s waiting room between 1 hour before and 30 minutes before we arrived. I was also informed that measles is regarded as “airborne” and can stay in the air and on surfaces up to 2 hours after the infected person has left.

    I was then asked if I had had the measles vaccine. I had.

    Griffin. Griffin had not. Can not.

    I was advised to not be around small children. If I worked in such an environment I would be written off work. I do work in such an environment; my home. Where I now sit with Griffin and my 3-year-old, Aurelia, who has only been able to get one MMR vaccine so far. She is now, technically, exposed too. We are to sit tight and watch for symptoms: fever, cough, runny nose. If we develop any of these we are to call my doctor and arrange to come in under official medical precautions. We are to wait at home, in isolation, until February 17th, after which the 21 days of possible incubation will have passed and we are clear.

    So, Griffin is now Schrödinger’s baby. Simultaneously with measles, and without it. Until he develops symptoms, or until a further 7 days pass. One or other.

    And I’m angry. Angry as hell.

    I won’t get angry at or blame the person in the waiting room. I would have likely done the same thing…you get sick, you go to the doctor. I have no idea what their story is and I will never know. But I do know one thing:

    If you have chosen to not vaccinate yourself or your child, I blame you.

    I blame you.

    You have stood on the shoulders of our collective protection for too long. From that high height, we have given you the PRIVILEGE of our protection, for free. And in return, you gave me this week. A week from hell. Wherein I don’t know if my BABY will develop something that has DEATH as a potential outcome.

    DEATH.

    Now, let’s unpack this shall we. All out on the table.

    You have NO IDEA what this “potential outcome” means. NO IDEA. I do. Unfortunately, I do.

    You think you are protecting your children from thimerosal? You aren’t. It’s not in their vaccine.

    You think you are protecting them from autism? You aren’t. There is no, none, nada, nothing in science that proves this. If you want to use google instead of science to “prove me wrong” then I am happy to call you an imbecile as well as misinformed.

    You think you are protecting them through extracts and homeopathy and positive thoughts and Laws of Attraction and dancing by candlelight on a full moon? You aren’t. I PROTECT YOUR CHILD. We protect your child. By being concerned world citizens who care about ourselves, our fellow-man, and our most vulnerable. So we vaccinate ourselves and our children.

    You think you are protecting them by letting them eat their shovel full of dirt and reducing antibiotics and eating organic? You aren’t. As an unvaccinated person you are only protected by our good graces. WE LET YOU BE SO PRIVILEGED thanks to our willingness to vaccinate ourselves and our children.

    You know what vaccines protect your children from? Pain. Suffering. Irreparable harm. Death.

    And you would be the first to line up if you had an inkling of what the death of a child feels like. You would be crawling through the streets on your hands and knees, begging, BEGGING to get that vaccine into your precious babies because that is what I would have done, if I could, to save my daughter.

    The fact is, there was no vaccine for her. Not for her illness. And she died. She died at age five and a half, and she is gone.

    And I watch these arguments trotted out on Facebook and twitter citing false science and long discredited“studies” that just won’t stop and Jenny McCarthy quotes and “it’s MY choice” to not vaccinate…and I think…what would you have done if your child lay dying? Would you give them a scientifically proven, safe and effective vaccine and risk the minuscule likelihood of a side effect? Or would you let them go, knowing that at least they won’t develop autism (which they wouldn’t even develop anyway because SCIENCE)?

    And don’t you DARE tell me that you wouldn’t vaccinate them then. Don’t you dare. You have no idea what it feels like to go through what we went through.

    So, look at Griffin. Tell me why he gets to bear the brunt of your stupidity and reckless abuse of our protection? Tell me.

    Seven more days until I know that my baby is safe. Seven more days.

    How is your week going, anti-vaxxers?